Industry comparison

Auxiliary financial and insurance activities by regions.

Compare the eligible Auxiliary financial and insurance activities cohort across regions. Each row keeps company scale alongside health, profitability, growth and risk context.

SIC 6650-company minimum cohort Calculated 2 Jul 2026
Compare size bandsIndustry profile
Comparable regions11Eligible public cohorts
Company base26.1KAcross displayed regions
Largest cohort9,727London
Largest cohort health67Largest cohort’s average score
Eligible rows110 excluded below cohort
Invalid metric rows0Omitted instead of inferred

Cohort comparison

Auxiliary financial and insurance activities by regions

Ranked by company count. Profitability is a derived 0–100 score; lower insolvency-risk score is safer.

11 rows
#UK regionCompaniesHealth scoreProfitability scoreGross marginGrowthRisk
1 LondonE12000007 · find companies 9,727 67 41 82.3% 343.1% 27
2 South EastE12000008 · find companies 3,561 67 41 74.1% 0.0% 26
3 East of EnglandE12000006 · find companies 2,571 66 40 92.5% 0.0% 26
4 North WestE12000002 · find companies 2,324 66 40 87.1% 0.0% 27
5 South WestE12000009 · find companies 1,832 69 40 58.1% 0.0% 26
6 West MidlandsE12000005 · find companies 1,565 66 40 57.6% 0.0% 26
7 Yorkshire and The HumberE12000003 · find companies 1,351 67 40 79.7% 0.0% 26
8 East MidlandsE12000004 · find companies 1,307 66 40 78.1% 82.5% 26
9 WalesW99999999 · find companies 981 65 40 69.9% 0.0% 28
10 North EastE12000001 · find companies 494 67 40 100.0% 0.0% 26
11 Northern IrelandN99999999 · find companies 393 67 40 22.8% 0.0% 27
Benchmark context Companies House aggregate snapshot Minimum cohort 50 Calculated 2 Jul 2026