Industry comparison

Civil engineering by regions.

Compare the eligible Civil engineering cohort across regions. Each row keeps company scale alongside health, profitability, growth and risk context.

SIC 4250-company minimum cohort Calculated 2 Jul 2026
Compare size bandsIndustry profile
Comparable regions11Eligible public cohorts
Company base31.2KAcross displayed regions
Largest cohort5,859London
Largest cohort health63Largest cohort’s average score
Eligible rows110 excluded below cohort
Invalid metric rows0Omitted instead of inferred

Cohort comparison

Civil engineering by regions

Ranked by company count. Profitability is a derived 0–100 score; lower insolvency-risk score is safer.

11 rows
#UK regionCompaniesHealth scoreProfitability scoreGross marginGrowthRisk
1 LondonE12000007 · find companies 5,859 63 41 51.4% 95.9% 29
2 South EastE12000008 · find companies 4,173 65 41 32.9% 21.4% 28
3 North WestE12000002 · find companies 3,958 63 40 28.2% 0.0% 29
4 East of EnglandE12000006 · find companies 3,560 64 40 37.7% 4.9% 28
5 West MidlandsE12000005 · find companies 3,083 63 40 36.4% 89.7% 29
6 Yorkshire and The HumberE12000003 · find companies 2,497 64 40 24.1% -1.5% 28
7 East MidlandsE12000004 · find companies 2,088 65 40 22.3% 0.0% 27
8 South WestE12000009 · find companies 1,922 65 40 28.9% 11.4% 27
9 WalesW99999999 · find companies 1,745 63 40 44.2% 0.0% 29
10 North EastE12000001 · find companies 1,406 63 40 45.0% 0.0% 30
11 Northern IrelandN99999999 · find companies 910 65 40 23.0% 0.0% 28
Benchmark context Companies House aggregate snapshot Minimum cohort 50 Calculated 2 Jul 2026