Industry comparison

Crop and animal production, hunting by regions.

Compare the eligible Crop and animal production, hunting cohort across regions. Each row keeps company scale alongside health, profitability, growth and risk context.

SIC 0150-company minimum cohort Calculated 2 Jul 2026
Compare size bandsIndustry profile
Comparable regions11Eligible public cohorts
Company base32.7KAcross displayed regions
Largest cohort4,584South East
Largest cohort health66Largest cohort’s average score
Eligible rows110 excluded below cohort
Invalid metric rows0Omitted instead of inferred

Cohort comparison

Crop and animal production, hunting by regions

Ranked by company count. Profitability is a derived 0–100 score; lower insolvency-risk score is safer.

11 rows
#UK regionCompaniesHealth scoreProfitability scoreGross marginGrowthRisk
1 South EastE12000008 · find companies 4,584 66 41 73.9% -8.3% 28
2 East of EnglandE12000006 · find companies 4,523 68 40 48.2% 11.6% 26
3 South WestE12000009 · find companies 4,449 67 41 62.9% -31.8% 28
4 East MidlandsE12000004 · find companies 3,309 68 40 92.0% -13.5% 26
5 North WestE12000002 · find companies 2,935 65 40 63.8% 0.0% 29
6 West MidlandsE12000005 · find companies 2,889 66 40 101.1% 0.0% 28
7 Yorkshire and The HumberE12000003 · find companies 2,810 66 40 68.2% 99.9% 27
8 LondonE12000007 · find companies 2,368 62 41 125.8% 0.0% 30
9 WalesW99999999 · find companies 2,162 64 40 109.7% 0.0% 29
10 Northern IrelandN99999999 · find companies 1,843 65 40 29.7% -6.1% 29
11 North EastE12000001 · find companies 799 65 40 46.0% 0.0% 29
Benchmark context Companies House aggregate snapshot Minimum cohort 50 Calculated 2 Jul 2026