Industry comparison

Fishing and aquaculture by regions.

Compare the eligible Fishing and aquaculture cohort across regions. Each row keeps company scale alongside health, profitability, growth and risk context.

SIC 0350-company minimum cohort Calculated 2 Jul 2026
Compare size bandsIndustry profile
Comparable regions11Eligible public cohorts
Company base2,468Across displayed regions
Largest cohort487South West
Largest cohort health64Largest cohort’s average score
Eligible rows110 excluded below cohort
Invalid metric rows0Omitted instead of inferred

Cohort comparison

Fishing and aquaculture by regions

Ranked by company count. Profitability is a derived 0–100 score; lower insolvency-risk score is safer.

11 rows
#UK regionCompaniesHealth scoreProfitability scoreGross marginGrowthRisk
1 South WestE12000009 · find companies 487 64 41 143.9% 0.0% 31
2 South EastE12000008 · find companies 371 64 41 57.9% 0.0% 28
3 East of EnglandE12000006 · find companies 276 63 40 0.0% 0.0% 30
4 Yorkshire and The HumberE12000003 · find companies 252 65 40 39.3% 0.0% 28
5 LondonE12000007 · find companies 242 63 41 100.0% 0.0% 31
6 North WestE12000002 · find companies 187 64 40 26.1% 0.0% 31
7 WalesW99999999 · find companies 167 63 41 0.0% 0.0% 31
8 Northern IrelandN99999999 · find companies 164 65 40 0.0% 0.0% 30
9 East MidlandsE12000004 · find companies 128 64 41 40.9% 0.0% 28
10 West MidlandsE12000005 · find companies 124 61 41 38.3% -42.1% 34
11 North EastE12000001 · find companies 70 66 40 0.0% 0.0% 29
Benchmark context Companies House aggregate snapshot Minimum cohort 50 Calculated 2 Jul 2026