Industry comparison

Gambling and betting activities by regions.

Compare the eligible Gambling and betting activities cohort across regions. Each row keeps company scale alongside health, profitability, growth and risk context.

SIC 9250-company minimum cohort Calculated 2 Jul 2026
Compare size bandsIndustry profile
Comparable regions11Eligible public cohorts
Company base1,676Across displayed regions
Largest cohort411London
Largest cohort health61Largest cohort’s average score
Eligible rows111 excluded below cohort
Invalid metric rows0Omitted instead of inferred

Cohort comparison

Gambling and betting activities by regions

Ranked by company count. Profitability is a derived 0–100 score; lower insolvency-risk score is safer.

11 rows
#UK regionCompaniesHealth scoreProfitability scoreGross marginGrowthRisk
1 LondonE12000007 · find companies 411 61 41 56.2% 0.0% 31
2 South EastE12000008 · find companies 207 62 40 0.0% 0.0% 30
3 North WestE12000002 · find companies 206 63 41 53.7% 0.0% 30
4 East of EnglandE12000006 · find companies 165 63 40 0.0% 0.0% 30
5 West MidlandsE12000005 · find companies 130 66 41 86.1% 0.0% 28
6 Yorkshire and The HumberE12000003 · find companies 126 62 42 58.2% 0.0% 29
7 South WestE12000009 · find companies 102 64 40 0.0% 0.0% 30
8 WalesW99999999 · find companies 102 64 40 0.0% 0.0% 29
9 Northern IrelandN99999999 · find companies 88 63 40 0.0% 0.0% 27
10 East MidlandsE12000004 · find companies 79 63 40 0.0% 0.0% 30
11 North EastE12000001 · find companies 60 63 41 100.0% 0.0% 31
Benchmark context Companies House aggregate snapshot Minimum cohort 50 Calculated 2 Jul 2026