Industry comparison

Households as employers of domestic personnel by regions.

Compare the eligible Households as employers of domestic personnel cohort across regions. Each row keeps company scale alongside health, profitability, growth and risk context.

SIC 9750-company minimum cohort Calculated 2 Jul 2026
Comparable regions5Eligible public cohorts
Company base603Across displayed regions
Largest cohort314London
Largest cohort health63Largest cohort’s average score
Eligible rows56 excluded below cohort
Invalid metric rows0Omitted instead of inferred

Cohort comparison

Households as employers of domestic personnel by regions

Ranked by company count. Profitability is a derived 0–100 score; lower insolvency-risk score is safer.

5 rows
Households as employers of domestic personnel benchmark by UK region
#UK regionCompaniesHealth scoreProfitability scoreGross marginGrowthRisk lower is safer
1 LondonE12000007 · find companies 314 63 40 94.2% 0.0% 29
2 South EastE12000008 · find companies 117 65 41 54.8% 0.0% 29
3 East of EnglandE12000006 · find companies 66 61 40 0.0% 0.0% 32
4 North WestE12000002 · find companies 54 62 40 0.0% 0.0% 31
5 South WestE12000009 · find companies 52 63 40 99.3% 0.0% 31
Benchmark context Companies House aggregate snapshot Minimum cohort 50 Calculated 2 Jul 2026