Industry comparison

Human health activities by regions.

Compare the eligible Human health activities cohort across regions. Each row keeps company scale alongside health, profitability, growth and risk context.

SIC 8650-company minimum cohort Calculated 2 Jul 2026
Compare size bandsIndustry profile
Comparable regions11Eligible public cohorts
Company base175.0KAcross displayed regions
Largest cohort43.5KLondon
Largest cohort health64Largest cohort’s average score
Eligible rows110 excluded below cohort
Invalid metric rows0Omitted instead of inferred

Cohort comparison

Human health activities by regions

Ranked by company count. Profitability is a derived 0–100 score; lower insolvency-risk score is safer.

11 rows
#UK regionCompaniesHealth scoreProfitability scoreGross marginGrowthRisk
1 LondonE12000007 · find companies 43.5K 64 40 70.7% 4.8% 29
2 South EastE12000008 · find companies 24.7K 66 40 71.7% 18.8% 28
3 North WestE12000002 · find companies 22.9K 65 40 78.0% 0.0% 28
4 East of EnglandE12000006 · find companies 18.2K 65 40 83.2% 12.3% 29
5 West MidlandsE12000005 · find companies 16.2K 65 40 94.6% 19.5% 28
6 Yorkshire and The HumberE12000003 · find companies 13.5K 66 40 77.2% 2.8% 27
7 East MidlandsE12000004 · find companies 11.7K 66 40 78.2% 0.0% 28
8 South WestE12000009 · find companies 11.4K 66 40 77.1% 157.6% 28
9 WalesW99999999 · find companies 5,595 65 40 105.5% 0.0% 28
10 North EastE12000001 · find companies 4,378 65 40 71.0% 0.0% 29
11 Northern IrelandN99999999 · find companies 2,824 65 40 81.4% 0.0% 29
Benchmark context Companies House aggregate snapshot Minimum cohort 50 Calculated 2 Jul 2026