Industry comparison

Insurance and pension funding by regions.

Compare the eligible Insurance and pension funding cohort across regions. Each row keeps company scale alongside health, profitability, growth and risk context.

SIC 6550-company minimum cohort Calculated 2 Jul 2026
Comparable regions11Eligible public cohorts
Company base6,495Across displayed regions
Largest cohort2,824London
Largest cohort health70Largest cohort’s average score
Eligible rows110 excluded below cohort
Invalid metric rows0Omitted instead of inferred

Cohort comparison

Insurance and pension funding by regions

Ranked by company count. Profitability is a derived 0–100 score; lower insolvency-risk score is safer.

11 rows
Insurance and pension funding benchmark by UK region
#UK regionCompaniesHealth scoreProfitability scoreGross marginGrowthRisk lower is safer
1 LondonE12000007 · find companies 2,824 70 41 82.5% 11.3% 25
2 South EastE12000008 · find companies 804 70 41 77.1% 0.0% 24
3 East of EnglandE12000006 · find companies 518 70 40 85.6% 0.0% 23
4 North WestE12000002 · find companies 485 68 40 69.9% 0.0% 26
5 East MidlandsE12000004 · find companies 395 70 40 43.2% 0.0% 23
6 Yorkshire and The HumberE12000003 · find companies 379 68 40 0.0% 0.0% 25
7 West MidlandsE12000005 · find companies 353 70 40 95.9% 0.0% 23
8 South WestE12000009 · find companies 347 70 41 58.8% 0.0% 24
9 WalesW99999999 · find companies 205 69 41 78.4% 0.0% 25
10 Northern IrelandN99999999 · find companies 107 68 40 35.0% 0.0% 27
11 North EastE12000001 · find companies 78 69 40 0.0% 0.0% 22
Benchmark context Companies House aggregate snapshot Minimum cohort 50 Calculated 2 Jul 2026