Industry comparison

Libraries, archives and museums by regions.

Compare the eligible Libraries, archives and museums cohort across regions. Each row keeps company scale alongside health, profitability, growth and risk context.

SIC 9150-company minimum cohort Calculated 2 Jul 2026
Compare size bandsIndustry profile
Comparable regions11Eligible public cohorts
Company base2,707Across displayed regions
Largest cohort524London
Largest cohort health68Largest cohort’s average score
Eligible rows110 excluded below cohort
Invalid metric rows0Omitted instead of inferred

Cohort comparison

Libraries, archives and museums by regions

Ranked by company count. Profitability is a derived 0–100 score; lower insolvency-risk score is safer.

11 rows
#UK regionCompaniesHealth scoreProfitability scoreGross marginGrowthRisk
1 LondonE12000007 · find companies 524 68 41 149.4% 0.0% 27
2 South EastE12000008 · find companies 442 71 41 71.5% 0.0% 25
3 South WestE12000009 · find companies 353 71 41 58.6% 58.2% 26
4 East of EnglandE12000006 · find companies 289 71 41 64.3% 0.0% 26
5 North WestE12000002 · find companies 248 69 41 58.8% 0.0% 26
6 West MidlandsE12000005 · find companies 194 70 41 62.7% 0.0% 26
7 Yorkshire and The HumberE12000003 · find companies 186 71 41 57.4% 0.0% 26
8 WalesW99999999 · find companies 163 71 41 48.7% 0.0% 25
9 East MidlandsE12000004 · find companies 159 72 40 360.6% 0.0% 25
10 North EastE12000001 · find companies 81 72 41 34.7% 0.0% 25
11 Northern IrelandN99999999 · find companies 68 68 42 50.4% 0.0% 27
Benchmark context Companies House aggregate snapshot Minimum cohort 50 Calculated 2 Jul 2026