Industry comparison

Manufacture of wearing apparel by regions.

Compare the eligible Manufacture of wearing apparel cohort across regions. Each row keeps company scale alongside health, profitability, growth and risk context.

SIC 1450-company minimum cohort Calculated 2 Jul 2026
Compare size bandsIndustry profile
Comparable regions11Eligible public cohorts
Company base11.0KAcross displayed regions
Largest cohort4,632London
Largest cohort health61Largest cohort’s average score
Eligible rows110 excluded below cohort
Invalid metric rows0Omitted instead of inferred

Cohort comparison

Manufacture of wearing apparel by regions

Ranked by company count. Profitability is a derived 0–100 score; lower insolvency-risk score is safer.

11 rows
#UK regionCompaniesHealth scoreProfitability scoreGross marginGrowthRisk
1 LondonE12000007 · find companies 4,632 61 41 91.8% 0.0% 31
2 South EastE12000008 · find companies 1,036 63 41 58.5% 0.0% 30
3 North WestE12000002 · find companies 992 62 41 39.9% 621.4% 31
4 East MidlandsE12000004 · find companies 856 62 40 41.6% 0.0% 31
5 East of EnglandE12000006 · find companies 846 62 40 45.3% 0.0% 31
6 West MidlandsE12000005 · find companies 820 62 40 44.9% 0.0% 31
7 South WestE12000009 · find companies 495 64 41 14.9% 0.0% 31
8 Yorkshire and The HumberE12000003 · find companies 485 62 40 92.9% 0.0% 31
9 WalesW99999999 · find companies 429 59 40 91.0% 0.0% 33
10 North EastE12000001 · find companies 188 62 41 58.7% 0.0% 31
11 Northern IrelandN99999999 · find companies 176 62 41 93.7% 0.0% 30
Benchmark context Companies House aggregate snapshot Minimum cohort 50 Calculated 2 Jul 2026