Industry comparison

Mining support service activities by regions.

Compare the eligible Mining support service activities cohort across regions. Each row keeps company scale alongside health, profitability, growth and risk context.

SIC 0950-company minimum cohort Calculated 2 Jul 2026
Compare size bandsIndustry profile
Comparable regions10Eligible public cohorts
Company base2,971Across displayed regions
Largest cohort931London
Largest cohort health66Largest cohort’s average score
Eligible rows101 excluded below cohort
Invalid metric rows0Omitted instead of inferred

Cohort comparison

Mining support service activities by regions

Ranked by company count. Profitability is a derived 0–100 score; lower insolvency-risk score is safer.

10 rows
#UK regionCompaniesHealth scoreProfitability scoreGross marginGrowthRisk
1 LondonE12000007 · find companies 931 66 40 35.8% 0.0% 28
2 South EastE12000008 · find companies 400 67 41 60.2% 0.0% 27
3 East of EnglandE12000006 · find companies 345 65 40 41.9% 0.0% 30
4 North WestE12000002 · find companies 263 63 42 0.0% 26.8% 29
5 North EastE12000001 · find companies 251 63 40 0.0% 0.0% 29
6 South WestE12000009 · find companies 220 69 41 37.1% 0.0% 26
7 Yorkshire and The HumberE12000003 · find companies 178 64 41 88.1% 10.2% 28
8 East MidlandsE12000004 · find companies 134 68 40 31.6% 0.0% 27
9 WalesW99999999 · find companies 125 63 40 0.0% 0.0% 30
10 West MidlandsE12000005 · find companies 124 66 40 12.3% 0.0% 27
Benchmark context Companies House aggregate snapshot Minimum cohort 50 Calculated 2 Jul 2026