Industry comparison

Printing and reproduction of recorded media by regions.

Compare the eligible Printing and reproduction of recorded media cohort across regions. Each row keeps company scale alongside health, profitability, growth and risk context.

SIC 1850-company minimum cohort Calculated 2 Jul 2026
Compare size bandsIndustry profile
Comparable regions11Eligible public cohorts
Company base14.6KAcross displayed regions
Largest cohort3,741London
Largest cohort health62Largest cohort’s average score
Eligible rows110 excluded below cohort
Invalid metric rows0Omitted instead of inferred

Cohort comparison

Printing and reproduction of recorded media by regions

Ranked by company count. Profitability is a derived 0–100 score; lower insolvency-risk score is safer.

11 rows
#UK regionCompaniesHealth scoreProfitability scoreGross marginGrowthRisk
1 LondonE12000007 · find companies 3,741 62 40 59.5% 15.3% 31
2 South EastE12000008 · find companies 2,085 64 41 47.8% 0.0% 29
3 East of EnglandE12000006 · find companies 1,613 64 41 38.5% 0.0% 28
4 North WestE12000002 · find companies 1,477 62 40 36.4% 0.0% 30
5 West MidlandsE12000005 · find companies 1,285 63 40 34.3% 0.0% 30
6 East MidlandsE12000004 · find companies 1,125 64 40 36.4% 0.0% 29
7 Yorkshire and The HumberE12000003 · find companies 1,098 64 40 43.7% 0.0% 29
8 South WestE12000009 · find companies 1,034 65 41 48.0% 0.0% 29
9 WalesW99999999 · find companies 548 62 40 48.5% 0.0% 30
10 North EastE12000001 · find companies 361 63 41 34.4% 0.0% 30
11 Northern IrelandN99999999 · find companies 216 63 41 29.4% 0.0% 30
Benchmark context Companies House aggregate snapshot Minimum cohort 50 Calculated 2 Jul 2026