Industry comparison

Programming and broadcasting activities by regions.

Compare the eligible Programming and broadcasting activities cohort across regions. Each row keeps company scale alongside health, profitability, growth and risk context.

SIC 6050-company minimum cohort Calculated 2 Jul 2026
Compare size bandsIndustry profile
Comparable regions11Eligible public cohorts
Company base5,156Across displayed regions
Largest cohort1,756London
Largest cohort health65Largest cohort’s average score
Eligible rows110 excluded below cohort
Invalid metric rows0Omitted instead of inferred

Cohort comparison

Programming and broadcasting activities by regions

Ranked by company count. Profitability is a derived 0–100 score; lower insolvency-risk score is safer.

11 rows
#UK regionCompaniesHealth scoreProfitability scoreGross marginGrowthRisk
1 LondonE12000007 · find companies 1,756 65 40 152.4% -87.5% 28
2 South EastE12000008 · find companies 895 65 40 73.4% 0.0% 28
3 North WestE12000002 · find companies 482 64 41 68.6% 0.0% 29
4 East of EnglandE12000006 · find companies 481 65 40 58.3% 0.0% 29
5 South WestE12000009 · find companies 313 66 41 128.4% 0.0% 29
6 Yorkshire and The HumberE12000003 · find companies 309 63 41 62.9% 0.0% 31
7 West MidlandsE12000005 · find companies 305 63 41 95.3% 0.0% 29
8 WalesW99999999 · find companies 224 63 40 10.9% 0.0% 29
9 East MidlandsE12000004 · find companies 220 64 41 95.6% 0.0% 29
10 North EastE12000001 · find companies 92 61 41 100.0% 0.0% 32
11 Northern IrelandN99999999 · find companies 79 62 40 0.0% 0.0% 30
Benchmark context Companies House aggregate snapshot Minimum cohort 50 Calculated 2 Jul 2026