Industry comparison

Remediation and other waste management by regions.

Compare the eligible Remediation and other waste management cohort across regions. Each row keeps company scale alongside health, profitability, growth and risk context.

SIC 3950-company minimum cohort Calculated 2 Jul 2026
Comparable regions11Eligible public cohorts
Company base3,149Across displayed regions
Largest cohort526London
Largest cohort health63Largest cohort’s average score
Eligible rows110 excluded below cohort
Invalid metric rows0Omitted instead of inferred

Cohort comparison

Remediation and other waste management by regions

Ranked by company count. Profitability is a derived 0–100 score; lower insolvency-risk score is safer.

11 rows
Remediation and other waste management benchmark by UK region
#UK regionCompaniesHealth scoreProfitability scoreGross marginGrowthRisk lower is safer
1 LondonE12000007 · find companies 526 63 40 47.3% 0.0% 29
2 South EastE12000008 · find companies 413 66 41 31.0% 0.0% 27
3 North WestE12000002 · find companies 406 65 41 47.7% 0.0% 27
4 West MidlandsE12000005 · find companies 364 65 41 51.2% 0.0% 27
5 East of EnglandE12000006 · find companies 361 64 40 46.3% 3.5% 28
6 Yorkshire and The HumberE12000003 · find companies 252 65 40 71.7% 0.0% 28
7 East MidlandsE12000004 · find companies 237 66 40 22.3% 0.0% 27
8 South WestE12000009 · find companies 230 66 41 43.5% 21.5% 27
9 WalesW99999999 · find companies 153 65 40 43.6% 0.0% 27
10 Northern IrelandN99999999 · find companies 112 63 40 21.4% 0.0% 29
11 North EastE12000001 · find companies 95 66 41 29.2% 0.0% 27
Benchmark context Companies House aggregate snapshot Minimum cohort 50 Calculated 2 Jul 2026