Industry comparison

Repair and installation of machinery by regions.

Compare the eligible Repair and installation of machinery cohort across regions. Each row keeps company scale alongside health, profitability, growth and risk context.

SIC 3350-company minimum cohort Calculated 2 Jul 2026
Comparable regions11Eligible public cohorts
Company base32.1KAcross displayed regions
Largest cohort4,634South East
Largest cohort health65Largest cohort’s average score
Eligible rows110 excluded below cohort
Invalid metric rows0Omitted instead of inferred

Cohort comparison

Repair and installation of machinery by regions

Ranked by company count. Profitability is a derived 0–100 score; lower insolvency-risk score is safer.

11 rows
Repair and installation of machinery benchmark by UK region
#UK regionCompaniesHealth scoreProfitability scoreGross marginGrowthRisk lower is safer
1 South EastE12000008 · find companies 4,634 65 40 44.1% 10.8% 28
2 LondonE12000007 · find companies 4,606 62 41 53.6% 503.2% 30
3 East of EnglandE12000006 · find companies 3,844 64 40 49.3% 0.9% 28
4 North WestE12000002 · find companies 3,562 64 40 46.3% -22.4% 28
5 West MidlandsE12000005 · find companies 3,239 65 40 32.1% -34.2% 28
6 Yorkshire and The HumberE12000003 · find companies 2,772 65 40 40.3% 0.0% 27
7 South WestE12000009 · find companies 2,741 65 40 41.0% -15.8% 28
8 East MidlandsE12000004 · find companies 2,553 65 40 33.0% -18.0% 28
9 WalesW99999999 · find companies 1,811 62 40 77.6% 0.0% 30
10 North EastE12000001 · find companies 1,403 63 40 30.0% 317.7% 30
11 Northern IrelandN99999999 · find companies 948 63 40 33.8% -22.8% 30
Benchmark context Companies House aggregate snapshot Minimum cohort 50 Calculated 2 Jul 2026