Industry comparison

Repair of computers and household goods by regions.

Compare the eligible Repair of computers and household goods cohort across regions. Each row keeps company scale alongside health, profitability, growth and risk context.

SIC 9550-company minimum cohort Calculated 2 Jul 2026
Comparable regions11Eligible public cohorts
Company base7,620Across displayed regions
Largest cohort2,089London
Largest cohort health60Largest cohort’s average score
Eligible rows110 excluded below cohort
Invalid metric rows0Omitted instead of inferred

Cohort comparison

Repair of computers and household goods by regions

Ranked by company count. Profitability is a derived 0–100 score; lower insolvency-risk score is safer.

11 rows
Repair of computers and household goods benchmark by UK region
#UK regionCompaniesHealth scoreProfitability scoreGross marginGrowthRisk lower is safer
1 LondonE12000007 · find companies 2,089 60 40 214.2% 0.0% 32
2 South EastE12000008 · find companies 1,104 62 41 65.1% -11.5% 31
3 North WestE12000002 · find companies 885 60 40 46.1% 0.0% 32
4 East of EnglandE12000006 · find companies 774 62 40 52.2% 0.0% 30
5 West MidlandsE12000005 · find companies 589 62 40 64.4% 0.0% 31
6 Yorkshire and The HumberE12000003 · find companies 545 62 40 89.2% 0.0% 31
7 South WestE12000009 · find companies 538 63 41 69.3% 0.0% 31
8 East MidlandsE12000004 · find companies 458 61 40 38.7% 0.0% 31
9 WalesW99999999 · find companies 329 59 40 68.1% 0.0% 32
10 North EastE12000001 · find companies 227 61 41 55.6% 0.0% 32
11 Northern IrelandN99999999 · find companies 82 61 40 0.0% 0.0% 31
Benchmark context Companies House aggregate snapshot Minimum cohort 50 Calculated 2 Jul 2026