Industry comparison

Scientific research and development by regions.

Compare the eligible Scientific research and development cohort across regions. Each row keeps company scale alongside health, profitability, growth and risk context.

SIC 7250-company minimum cohort Calculated 2 Jul 2026
Compare size bandsIndustry profile
Comparable regions11Eligible public cohorts
Company base13.1KAcross displayed regions
Largest cohort4,177London
Largest cohort health64Largest cohort’s average score
Eligible rows110 excluded below cohort
Invalid metric rows0Omitted instead of inferred

Cohort comparison

Scientific research and development by regions

Ranked by company count. Profitability is a derived 0–100 score; lower insolvency-risk score is safer.

11 rows
#UK regionCompaniesHealth scoreProfitability scoreGross marginGrowthRisk
1 LondonE12000007 · find companies 4,177 64 41 104.2% 0.0% 29
2 South EastE12000008 · find companies 2,199 66 41 128.0% 0.0% 27
3 East of EnglandE12000006 · find companies 1,750 67 41 105.3% -3.5% 27
4 North WestE12000002 · find companies 1,154 65 40 84.2% 2.1% 28
5 South WestE12000009 · find companies 913 66 41 52.4% 0.0% 28
6 West MidlandsE12000005 · find companies 729 65 40 66.2% 0.0% 29
7 East MidlandsE12000004 · find companies 579 65 41 70.4% 0.0% 29
8 Yorkshire and The HumberE12000003 · find companies 574 66 40 50.2% 0.0% 29
9 WalesW99999999 · find companies 547 65 40 63.4% 0.0% 29
10 North EastE12000001 · find companies 249 66 40 65.5% 0.0% 28
11 Northern IrelandN99999999 · find companies 179 66 40 52.7% 0.0% 30
Benchmark context Companies House aggregate snapshot Minimum cohort 50 Calculated 2 Jul 2026