Industry comparison

Security and investigation activities by regions.

Compare the eligible Security and investigation activities cohort across regions. Each row keeps company scale alongside health, profitability, growth and risk context.

SIC 8050-company minimum cohort Calculated 2 Jul 2026
Comparable regions11Eligible public cohorts
Company base22.9KAcross displayed regions
Largest cohort6,822London
Largest cohort health62Largest cohort’s average score
Eligible rows110 excluded below cohort
Invalid metric rows0Omitted instead of inferred

Cohort comparison

Security and investigation activities by regions

Ranked by company count. Profitability is a derived 0–100 score; lower insolvency-risk score is safer.

11 rows
Security and investigation activities benchmark by UK region
#UK regionCompaniesHealth scoreProfitability scoreGross marginGrowthRisk lower is safer
1 LondonE12000007 · find companies 6,822 62 40 57.3% 20.5% 31
2 South EastE12000008 · find companies 3,049 64 40 56.2% 0.0% 29
3 North WestE12000002 · find companies 2,600 62 40 40.9% 17.8% 30
4 East of EnglandE12000006 · find companies 2,457 63 40 87.1% 175.0% 29
5 West MidlandsE12000005 · find companies 2,030 62 40 34.5% 0.0% 31
6 Yorkshire and The HumberE12000003 · find companies 1,496 62 40 37.8% 0.0% 31
7 South WestE12000009 · find companies 1,360 63 40 40.9% 0.0% 30
8 East MidlandsE12000004 · find companies 1,301 63 40 26.4% 30.9% 29
9 WalesW99999999 · find companies 923 61 40 55.7% 0.0% 31
10 North EastE12000001 · find companies 557 61 40 51.0% 0.0% 31
11 Northern IrelandN99999999 · find companies 291 62 40 24.8% 0.0% 31
Benchmark context Companies House aggregate snapshot Minimum cohort 50 Calculated 2 Jul 2026