Industry comparison

Sewerage by regions.

Compare the eligible Sewerage cohort across regions. Each row keeps company scale alongside health, profitability, growth and risk context.

SIC 3750-company minimum cohort Calculated 2 Jul 2026
Compare size bandsIndustry profile
Comparable regions9Eligible public cohorts
Company base1,471Across displayed regions
Largest cohort273South East
Largest cohort health64Largest cohort’s average score
Eligible rows92 excluded below cohort
Invalid metric rows0Omitted instead of inferred

Cohort comparison

Sewerage by regions

Ranked by company count. Profitability is a derived 0–100 score; lower insolvency-risk score is safer.

9 rows
#UK regionCompaniesHealth scoreProfitability scoreGross marginGrowthRisk
1 South EastE12000008 · find companies 273 64 40 6.4% 0.0% 29
2 LondonE12000007 · find companies 246 61 40 85.6% 0.0% 31
3 East of EnglandE12000006 · find companies 202 65 40 62.1% 0.0% 28
4 South WestE12000009 · find companies 183 64 41 63.1% 0.0% 30
5 North WestE12000002 · find companies 159 63 40 22.1% 0.0% 30
6 West MidlandsE12000005 · find companies 129 64 40 0.0% 0.0% 30
7 East MidlandsE12000004 · find companies 101 64 40 0.0% 0.0% 30
8 Yorkshire and The HumberE12000003 · find companies 91 65 41 36.0% 0.0% 28
9 WalesW99999999 · find companies 87 63 40 0.0% 0.0% 32
Benchmark context Companies House aggregate snapshot Minimum cohort 50 Calculated 2 Jul 2026