Industry comparison

Social work activities by regions.

Compare the eligible Social work activities cohort across regions. Each row keeps company scale alongside health, profitability, growth and risk context.

SIC 8850-company minimum cohort Calculated 2 Jul 2026
Compare size bandsIndustry profile
Comparable regions11Eligible public cohorts
Company base29.9KAcross displayed regions
Largest cohort8,765London
Largest cohort health65Largest cohort’s average score
Eligible rows110 excluded below cohort
Invalid metric rows0Omitted instead of inferred

Cohort comparison

Social work activities by regions

Ranked by company count. Profitability is a derived 0–100 score; lower insolvency-risk score is safer.

11 rows
#UK regionCompaniesHealth scoreProfitability scoreGross marginGrowthRisk
1 LondonE12000007 · find companies 8,765 65 41 73.7% 23.2% 28
2 South EastE12000008 · find companies 3,777 66 41 64.5% 0.0% 28
3 North WestE12000002 · find companies 3,461 65 41 83.4% 0.0% 28
4 East of EnglandE12000006 · find companies 2,931 65 41 68.3% 0.0% 28
5 West MidlandsE12000005 · find companies 2,831 65 41 91.0% 15.2% 29
6 Yorkshire and The HumberE12000003 · find companies 2,034 66 41 63.0% 0.0% 27
7 East MidlandsE12000004 · find companies 1,891 66 41 77.2% 0.0% 28
8 South WestE12000009 · find companies 1,849 68 41 89.9% 54.2% 27
9 WalesW99999999 · find companies 1,076 65 41 58.0% 6.9% 29
10 North EastE12000001 · find companies 726 66 41 75.3% 0.0% 28
11 Northern IrelandN99999999 · find companies 566 67 40 71.4% 0.0% 28
Benchmark context Companies House aggregate snapshot Minimum cohort 50 Calculated 2 Jul 2026