Industry comparison

Undifferentiated household activities by regions.

Compare the eligible Undifferentiated household activities cohort across regions. Each row keeps company scale alongside health, profitability, growth and risk context.

SIC 9850-company minimum cohort Calculated 2 Jul 2026
Compare size bandsIndustry profile
Comparable regions11Eligible public cohorts
Company base128.5KAcross displayed regions
Largest cohort35.3KLondon
Largest cohort health70Largest cohort’s average score
Eligible rows110 excluded below cohort
Invalid metric rows0Omitted instead of inferred

Cohort comparison

Undifferentiated household activities by regions

Ranked by company count. Profitability is a derived 0–100 score; lower insolvency-risk score is safer.

11 rows
#UK regionCompaniesHealth scoreProfitability scoreGross marginGrowthRisk
1 LondonE12000007 · find companies 35.3K 70 40 70.7% 1.3% 26
2 South EastE12000008 · find companies 28.0K 69 40 68.4% 17.7% 25
3 South WestE12000009 · find companies 17.0K 70 40 86.8% -3.1% 26
4 East of EnglandE12000006 · find companies 14.3K 67 40 64.0% 116.1% 26
5 North WestE12000002 · find companies 9,595 68 40 60.1% 0.0% 26
6 West MidlandsE12000005 · find companies 6,925 67 40 75.0% 0.0% 26
7 Yorkshire and The HumberE12000003 · find companies 5,795 68 40 63.3% 0.0% 26
8 East MidlandsE12000004 · find companies 4,491 65 40 50.3% 0.0% 27
9 Northern IrelandN99999999 · find companies 2,747 74 40 134.0% 0.0% 25
10 WalesW99999999 · find companies 2,700 67 40 100.0% 0.0% 27
11 North EastE12000001 · find companies 1,694 65 40 76.0% 0.0% 27
Benchmark context Companies House aggregate snapshot Minimum cohort 50 Calculated 2 Jul 2026