Industry comparison

Warehousing and transport support by regions.

Compare the eligible Warehousing and transport support cohort across regions. Each row keeps company scale alongside health, profitability, growth and risk context.

SIC 5250-company minimum cohort Calculated 2 Jul 2026
Compare size bandsIndustry profile
Comparable regions11Eligible public cohorts
Company base33.1KAcross displayed regions
Largest cohort7,733London
Largest cohort health61Largest cohort’s average score
Eligible rows110 excluded below cohort
Invalid metric rows0Omitted instead of inferred

Cohort comparison

Warehousing and transport support by regions

Ranked by company count. Profitability is a derived 0–100 score; lower insolvency-risk score is safer.

11 rows
#UK regionCompaniesHealth scoreProfitability scoreGross marginGrowthRisk
1 LondonE12000007 · find companies 7,733 61 41 61.8% 9.6% 31
2 South EastE12000008 · find companies 4,379 63 41 35.8% -12.0% 29
3 West MidlandsE12000005 · find companies 4,032 58 40 37.8% -35.5% 33
4 North WestE12000002 · find companies 3,701 60 40 44.0% 2.5% 31
5 East of EnglandE12000006 · find companies 3,454 63 41 39.9% 0.0% 30
6 East MidlandsE12000004 · find companies 2,594 61 40 46.8% -1.2% 31
7 Yorkshire and The HumberE12000003 · find companies 2,567 61 41 39.4% 0.0% 32
8 South WestE12000009 · find companies 1,939 63 41 62.3% -0.6% 30
9 WalesW99999999 · find companies 1,154 59 41 81.8% 0.0% 32
10 North EastE12000001 · find companies 1,152 58 41 135.3% 0.0% 33
11 Northern IrelandN99999999 · find companies 417 64 40 28.5% 0.0% 30
Benchmark context Companies House aggregate snapshot Minimum cohort 50 Calculated 2 Jul 2026