Industry comparison

Waste collection, treatment and disposal by regions.

Compare the eligible Waste collection, treatment and disposal cohort across regions. Each row keeps company scale alongside health, profitability, growth and risk context.

SIC 3850-company minimum cohort Calculated 2 Jul 2026
Compare size bandsIndustry profile
Comparable regions11Eligible public cohorts
Company base12.2KAcross displayed regions
Largest cohort2,471London
Largest cohort health61Largest cohort’s average score
Eligible rows110 excluded below cohort
Invalid metric rows0Omitted instead of inferred

Cohort comparison

Waste collection, treatment and disposal by regions

Ranked by company count. Profitability is a derived 0–100 score; lower insolvency-risk score is safer.

11 rows
#UK regionCompaniesHealth scoreProfitability scoreGross marginGrowthRisk
1 LondonE12000007 · find companies 2,471 61 41 48.3% 0.0% 32
2 South EastE12000008 · find companies 1,778 63 41 35.0% 0.0% 30
3 North WestE12000002 · find companies 1,433 64 41 29.7% 165.2% 29
4 East of EnglandE12000006 · find companies 1,332 63 41 32.5% -11.3% 29
5 West MidlandsE12000005 · find companies 1,208 64 41 36.0% 0.0% 28
6 Yorkshire and The HumberE12000003 · find companies 1,013 64 41 38.3% -10.7% 28
7 South WestE12000009 · find companies 837 64 41 31.5% 0.0% 29
8 East MidlandsE12000004 · find companies 793 65 41 34.3% 0.0% 28
9 WalesW99999999 · find companies 680 62 41 116.1% 0.0% 29
10 North EastE12000001 · find companies 409 62 40 25.9% 0.0% 30
11 Northern IrelandN99999999 · find companies 265 65 40 22.7% 0.0% 28
Benchmark context Companies House aggregate snapshot Minimum cohort 50 Calculated 2 Jul 2026