Industry comparison

Water transport by regions.

Compare the eligible Water transport cohort across regions. Each row keeps company scale alongside health, profitability, growth and risk context.

SIC 5050-company minimum cohort Calculated 2 Jul 2026
Compare size bandsIndustry profile
Comparable regions11Eligible public cohorts
Company base4,017Across displayed regions
Largest cohort1,681London
Largest cohort health66Largest cohort’s average score
Eligible rows110 excluded below cohort
Invalid metric rows0Omitted instead of inferred

Cohort comparison

Water transport by regions

Ranked by company count. Profitability is a derived 0–100 score; lower insolvency-risk score is safer.

11 rows
#UK regionCompaniesHealth scoreProfitability scoreGross marginGrowthRisk
1 LondonE12000007 · find companies 1,681 66 42 74.9% 0.0% 28
2 South EastE12000008 · find companies 548 65 41 50.9% 0.0% 28
3 East of EnglandE12000006 · find companies 336 67 40 16.4% 0.0% 27
4 North WestE12000002 · find companies 321 63 42 37.7% 0.0% 30
5 South WestE12000009 · find companies 306 64 42 45.0% 0.0% 29
6 West MidlandsE12000005 · find companies 209 64 41 29.5% -29.2% 30
7 Yorkshire and The HumberE12000003 · find companies 178 65 41 116.0% 0.0% 27
8 WalesW99999999 · find companies 175 64 41 32.2% 0.0% 29
9 East MidlandsE12000004 · find companies 108 61 40 0.0% 0.0% 31
10 North EastE12000001 · find companies 100 66 40 67.2% 0.0% 28
11 Northern IrelandN99999999 · find companies 55 66 40 6.3% 0.0% 29
Benchmark context Companies House aggregate snapshot Minimum cohort 50 Calculated 2 Jul 2026