Industry comparison

Forestry and logging by regions.

Compare the eligible Forestry and logging cohort across regions. Each row keeps company scale alongside health, profitability, growth and risk context.

SIC 0250-company minimum cohort Calculated 2 Jul 2026
Compare size bandsIndustry profile
Comparable regions11Eligible public cohorts
Company base4,905Across displayed regions
Largest cohort1,048South East
Largest cohort health64Largest cohort’s average score
Eligible rows110 excluded below cohort
Invalid metric rows0Omitted instead of inferred

Cohort comparison

Forestry and logging by regions

Ranked by company count. Profitability is a derived 0–100 score; lower insolvency-risk score is safer.

11 rows
#UK regionCompaniesHealth scoreProfitability scoreGross marginGrowthRisk
1 South EastE12000008 · find companies 1,048 64 40 50.7% 0.0% 28
2 South WestE12000009 · find companies 655 64 40 279.5% 0.0% 30
3 East of EnglandE12000006 · find companies 495 63 41 17.9% 0.0% 29
4 North WestE12000002 · find companies 487 62 40 39.7% 0.0% 29
5 LondonE12000007 · find companies 435 62 40 65.1% 0.0% 31
6 West MidlandsE12000005 · find companies 432 64 40 6.6% 0.0% 29
7 WalesW99999999 · find companies 408 64 41 53.2% 0.0% 29
8 East MidlandsE12000004 · find companies 367 63 40 100.0% 0.0% 31
9 Yorkshire and The HumberE12000003 · find companies 328 63 40 41.9% 0.0% 30
10 North EastE12000001 · find companies 163 63 40 93.0% 0.0% 32
11 Northern IrelandN99999999 · find companies 87 66 40 0.0% 0.0% 28
Benchmark context Companies House aggregate snapshot Minimum cohort 50 Calculated 2 Jul 2026