Industry comparison

Forestry and logging by size bands.

Compare the eligible Forestry and logging cohort across size bands. Each row keeps company scale alongside health, profitability, growth and risk context.

SIC 0250-company minimum cohort Calculated 2 Jul 2026
Comparable size bands1Eligible public cohorts
Company base5,777Across displayed size bands
Largest cohort5,777Micro / turnover unreported
Largest cohort health64Largest cohort’s average score
Eligible rows12 excluded below cohort
Invalid metric rows0Omitted instead of inferred

Cohort comparison

Forestry and logging by size bands

Ranked by company count. Profitability is a derived 0–100 score; lower insolvency-risk score is safer.

1 rows
Forestry and logging benchmark by company size
#company sizeCompaniesHealth scoreProfitability scoreGross marginGrowthRisk lower is safer
1 Micro / turnover unreportedMicro · find companies 5,777 64 40 97.8% 8.5% 29
Benchmark context Companies House aggregate snapshot Minimum cohort 50 Calculated 2 Jul 2026 Aggregate benchmark snapshot from Companies House-derived data. Rows below the minimum public cohort of 50 companies are excluded. At least two distinct eligible size cohorts are required for a public comparison. The current source refresh groups companies with unreported turnover into Micro. The Micro / turnover unreported row is not a pure turnover-size cohort.