Industry comparison

Services to buildings and landscape by regions.

Compare the eligible Services to buildings and landscape cohort across regions. Each row keeps company scale alongside health, profitability, growth and risk context.

SIC 8150-company minimum cohort Calculated 2 Jul 2026
Compare size bandsIndustry profile
Comparable regions11Eligible public cohorts
Company base74.1KAcross displayed regions
Largest cohort16.6KLondon
Largest cohort health60Largest cohort’s average score
Eligible rows110 excluded below cohort
Invalid metric rows0Omitted instead of inferred

Cohort comparison

Services to buildings and landscape by regions

Ranked by company count. Profitability is a derived 0–100 score; lower insolvency-risk score is safer.

11 rows
#UK regionCompaniesHealth scoreProfitability scoreGross marginGrowthRisk
1 LondonE12000007 · find companies 16.6K 60 41 62.1% 33.9% 32
2 South EastE12000008 · find companies 12.5K 62 40 49.2% 11.7% 31
3 East of EnglandE12000006 · find companies 8,764 61 40 63.4% -33.5% 31
4 North WestE12000002 · find companies 7,957 60 40 110.8% -4.9% 32
5 West MidlandsE12000005 · find companies 6,335 60 40 51.2% 0.0% 32
6 South WestE12000009 · find companies 5,932 62 40 62.8% 0.0% 31
7 Yorkshire and The HumberE12000003 · find companies 5,115 60 40 49.3% -15.5% 32
8 East MidlandsE12000004 · find companies 4,937 61 40 49.5% 0.8% 32
9 WalesW99999999 · find companies 2,969 60 40 62.8% 0.0% 32
10 North EastE12000001 · find companies 2,025 60 40 103.2% 0.0% 32
11 Northern IrelandN99999999 · find companies 894 62 40 46.3% 0.0% 32
Benchmark context Companies House aggregate snapshot Minimum cohort 50 Calculated 2 Jul 2026