Industry comparison

Services to buildings and landscape by size bands.

Compare the eligible Services to buildings and landscape cohort across size bands. Each row keeps company scale alongside health, profitability, growth and risk context.

SIC 8150-company minimum cohort Calculated 2 Jul 2026
Comparable size bands2Eligible public cohorts
Company base78.9KAcross displayed size bands
Largest cohort78.8KMicro / turnover unreported
Largest cohort health61Largest cohort’s average score
Eligible rows22 excluded below cohort
Invalid metric rows0Omitted instead of inferred

Cohort comparison

Services to buildings and landscape by size bands

Ranked by company count. Profitability is a derived 0–100 score; lower insolvency-risk score is safer.

2 rows
Services to buildings and landscape benchmark by company size
#company sizeCompaniesHealth scoreProfitability scoreGross marginGrowthRisk lower is safer
1 Micro / turnover unreportedMicro · find companies 78.8K 61 40 65.6% 3.0% 32
2 SmallSmall · find companies 155 68 58 55.3% 5.1% 28
Benchmark context Companies House aggregate snapshot Minimum cohort 50 Calculated 2 Jul 2026